1) I haven't seen them all, and won't see some of them until they are free on TV.
2) The whole thing is a crock. I'm with Stanley Kauffman on this. He writes:
Read his comments here.
I simply can't take seriously an affair that is presented as an artistic evaluation of the past year but is principally a commercial enterprise which deliberately disregards films, however good, that are not exploitable. Besides, who are the judges who make the selections? And who are the voters other than every Tom, Dick and Harriet who happens to have a job in the movie business?