Timothy Garton Ash argues in the Guardian that a U.S. attack on Iran would have apocalyptic consequences including the election of (shudder) Hillary. [here].
Reuel Marc Gerecht argues that the consequences of a failure to attack Iran would be far worse. [here]
Gee, wouldn't it be nice to have a reasonable discussion of public policy that wasn't framed in apocalyptic terms? But I guess that's too much to ask.
The sky is perpetually falling.
No comments:
Post a Comment